Cyber due diligence

See the exposure behind the opportunity.

A decision-focused view of cyber exposure for acquisitions, investments and strategic partnerships.

An attractive business can carry security liabilities that are difficult to see in a financial model. Unsupported infrastructure, unclear ownership and weak access controls can change the cost and practicality of an investment.

We help buyers and investors ask the right questions early. The review connects available technical evidence, operational maturity and business dependencies to the decisions a transaction requires.

The output is designed for action: material concerns, evidence gaps, remediation priorities and issues to carry into integration or further specialist review. Depth is matched to the information available, the transaction timetable and the agreed access.

The questions we address

Which weaknesses could change the investment decision?
What evidence is missing or needs technical verification?
Which remediation commitments should be prioritised?
What should be addressed during integration?

What you take away

A concise transaction-focused risk assessment
An evidence and information-gap register
Prioritised remediation and integration considerations
An executive briefing for the decision-makers

How the engagement unfolds

Align with the transaction

Agree decision deadlines, access, materiality and the boundaries of the review.

Review the evidence

Examine the available technical and organisational information and identify where assurance is weak.

Inform the decision

Present material exposures, dependencies and priorities for the next stage of the transaction.

Discover our approach

Questions before we begin

Is this a legal or financial opinion?

No. Cyber due diligence provides a security perspective. Contractual, valuation and regulatory decisions should be made with the relevant legal and financial advisers.

Can you work within a transaction deadline?

The scope and depth are set against the time and access available. Any limitations and unanswered questions are made explicit in the findings.

Does the engagement require active testing?

Not always. A documentary review, interviews and technical testing provide different levels of assurance. Active testing takes place only where separately authorised and scoped.

Find the path before the attacker does.

Tell us which assets matter most. We will define the offensive assessment, the research priorities and the decisions your organisation needs to make.

Discuss your needs